Happy Easter! Christ has risen, alleluia, alleluia!
Tuesday, March 29, 2016
Saturday, March 26, 2016
Dinner with Friends
We had dinner last night with some of our friends at their house and we got to take dessert. Since I had some fresh lemons from the Kerrs' trees, I decided to make lemon curd tarts. That was a fun project and they turned out quite tasty. We enjoyed eating them together, along with a delicious dinner and an edge-of-our-seats game of Pandemic where we were just barely able to cure all the diseases to pull off a win.
Thursday, March 24, 2016
Meeting Amari
We finally got a chance to get down to California to meet our new nephew, Amari. It was a short visit, but we got to spend a lot of time holding the baby and visiting with Joy and Solace. He is a sweet little guy and such a cutie.
Uncle Joshua holding him for the first time.
Friday afternoon we met up with my side of the family in Fresno to go ice skating. It had been a number of years since I had ice skated, so it was a lot of fun to do it again and the kids all loved it. Emery was pretty hesitant at first, but once she got out there with some help she loved it. Most of the following pictures from the day are from Heather.
Notice that Natalie and I are wearing matching jeans. Apparently, she dug hers out of the closet so we could match and they were exactly the color of the jeans I happened to be wearing that day.
Can't get enough of these beautiful ladies!
Here's the ice skating group. The session at the ice rink was from 3-6pm, so after we got done skating we met up with Dad and Isaac at a restaurant that served Chinese and Thai food. It was great to get to visit with everyone while we skated and than at dinner. I think we all felt the time was too brief because we lingered in the parking lot after dinner for awhile. Nevertheless, it was a good visit and nice to see everyone. I was really thankful that we were able to work out a way to all meet up during our brief time in California.
Back in Modesto, we enjoyed more time with baby Amari. We had a second family dinner with the Kerrs on Saturday and enjoyed a more relaxed day around the house. Gayle pulled out a number of the quilts that she has, including some of her first quilts and some made by her grandmother, and we had fun admiring all of them and taking pictures.
More pictures with the baby! These ones were taken by Lamar.
After everyone else left, we settled down to a game of Hearts with Dave and Gayle; a good way to end a great visit. The next morning we hit the road and came home. Although it would have been wonderful to have more time to spend with everyone, I kind of liked the short visit. It just felt more normal because we were there for a few days and saw everyone, then said see you again soon.
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
The Doctrine of Inerrancy
[In what follows, I use the word "inerrancy." While there are debates about the terms "inerrancy" and "infallibility," I do not take these debates as relevant to my thesis in this post, so substitute whichever term you like as you read.]
There are many variations on the idea that the scriptures are without error. According to the famous Chicago Statement, "Being wholly and verbally God-given, Scripture is without error or fault in all its teaching, no less in what it states about God's acts in creation, about the events of world history, and about its own literary origins under God, than in its witness to God's saving grace in individual lives." This somewhat excessive rendition of the doctrine may be contrasted with the more modest and orthodox version promulgated by the Second Vatican Council: "Since everything asserted by the inspired authors or sacred writers must be held to be asserted by the Holy Spirit, it follows that the books of Scripture must be acknowledged as teaching solidly, faithfully and without error that truth which God wanted put into sacred writings for the sake of salvation." Other versions will differ in similar respects.
In any case, though, what is the epistemological status of such a doctrine? Specifically, is the doctrine of inerrancy a conclusion of interpretation or an assumption for interpretation? Is it descriptive or regulative? In other words, does one examine the biblical texts, measuring them carefully, and discover them to be inerrant, or does one approach them from the beginning under the assumption that they are so as a guiding principle for interpretation?
For many people, the doctrine of inerrancy is clearly intended to serve an assumptive function: the scriptures are interpreted in light of or through the lens of their inerrancy. When apparent errors are found, they are examined not under the question, "does the best interpretation leave us with an error?", but instead, "since there is no error, how can we interpret this in such a way as to cause it to vanish?" If the doctrine is taken as a conclusion, it cannot play any role in the relevant interpretation without begging the question, and this seems to be precisely where it is most commonly invoked.
But why treat the doctrine this way? Instead of laying down inerrancy at the outset as a principle for interpretation, why not treat the doctrine as a conclusion to be reached through the careful study of the scriptures? If the scriptures are inerrant, they hardly need the help of such an assumption and are quite capable of defending the doctrine on their own merits. If the scriptures are inerrant, then there will be no difference at all between an approach which says, "do everything good interpreters do, plus assume inerrancy", and one which simply says, "do everything good interpreters do." If one believes the scriptures to be inerrant, the assumption of inerrancy as a principle of interpretation is, at best, redundant.
Thus, the doctrine of inerrancy need be taken as a principle for interpretation only by those who want to secure for the biblical text a status they believe it cannot secure for itself. Only if the scriptures are not inerrant does inerrancy need to guide interpretation.
There are many variations on the idea that the scriptures are without error. According to the famous Chicago Statement, "Being wholly and verbally God-given, Scripture is without error or fault in all its teaching, no less in what it states about God's acts in creation, about the events of world history, and about its own literary origins under God, than in its witness to God's saving grace in individual lives." This somewhat excessive rendition of the doctrine may be contrasted with the more modest and orthodox version promulgated by the Second Vatican Council: "Since everything asserted by the inspired authors or sacred writers must be held to be asserted by the Holy Spirit, it follows that the books of Scripture must be acknowledged as teaching solidly, faithfully and without error that truth which God wanted put into sacred writings for the sake of salvation." Other versions will differ in similar respects.
In any case, though, what is the epistemological status of such a doctrine? Specifically, is the doctrine of inerrancy a conclusion of interpretation or an assumption for interpretation? Is it descriptive or regulative? In other words, does one examine the biblical texts, measuring them carefully, and discover them to be inerrant, or does one approach them from the beginning under the assumption that they are so as a guiding principle for interpretation?
For many people, the doctrine of inerrancy is clearly intended to serve an assumptive function: the scriptures are interpreted in light of or through the lens of their inerrancy. When apparent errors are found, they are examined not under the question, "does the best interpretation leave us with an error?", but instead, "since there is no error, how can we interpret this in such a way as to cause it to vanish?" If the doctrine is taken as a conclusion, it cannot play any role in the relevant interpretation without begging the question, and this seems to be precisely where it is most commonly invoked.
But why treat the doctrine this way? Instead of laying down inerrancy at the outset as a principle for interpretation, why not treat the doctrine as a conclusion to be reached through the careful study of the scriptures? If the scriptures are inerrant, they hardly need the help of such an assumption and are quite capable of defending the doctrine on their own merits. If the scriptures are inerrant, then there will be no difference at all between an approach which says, "do everything good interpreters do, plus assume inerrancy", and one which simply says, "do everything good interpreters do." If one believes the scriptures to be inerrant, the assumption of inerrancy as a principle of interpretation is, at best, redundant.
Thus, the doctrine of inerrancy need be taken as a principle for interpretation only by those who want to secure for the biblical text a status they believe it cannot secure for itself. Only if the scriptures are not inerrant does inerrancy need to guide interpretation.
Tuesday, March 22, 2016
Sunday, March 13, 2016
My Birthday
I started my birthday off early by going to work for a 5:30am shift. Joshua, ever optimistic, said I should think about how much of my birthday I got to be awake to enjoy. Things went pretty well at work though; I had extra stuff to bake off because we were giving away mini cookies for my birthday, so it kept me busy, but was fun to have cookies everywhere. With all the cookies to give away and everyone wishing me a happy birthday, it did make the morning feel celebratory.
Here's the picture Heidi took and put on the bakery's facebook page with the caption, "Today is our sweet roll master baker Sarah's birthday! We've got little mini cookies we're handing out to celebrate today. Yay!" These three trays are about half of the sweet rolls I bake on Saturday mornings.
I got home to discover that Joshua had added a beautiful rose to the collection of birthday love on the table. I opened a couple presents after our late breakfast, but saved the rest to open after dinner. Joshua took me to get tacos for lunch at a place he just recently went to for the first time and that was fun and delicious. We got to watch most of the SHEMA concert that Evan, Micah, and Natalie were performing in through a live stream of the show. It was fun to be able to see that even though we are a state away. After the performance, we hurried outside to do some planting during a period of sun. We ended up missing the sun and got some rain on us instead, but we were able to plant two raspberry bushes that one of my coworkers brought to work last week; her parents have a lot of bushes at their house so she had dug some up from there to share with us. We also planted rhubarb, strawberries, and chamomile. I'm pretty excited about our coming garden, so that was a fun birthday activity even though we got rather wet and dirty and my old outdoor shoe fell apart during the project.
For dinner, we got to try out another new restaurant. We don't go out to eat often and there are so many great restaurants in Eugene, so it was really fun to get to try two new places.
One of my fellow bakers has told me a few times about a place she really likes called Party Downtown, so we decided to try it out. The name seems strange to me and didn't fit the restaurant, which was really well designed, but we were impressed. They sat us a great little table by the window and we got the kitchen's choice dinner where they bring out a number of small dishes to share so you get to try out a bunch of different things and never know what's coming next. Our dinner included a variety of pickled vegetables, a deep fried egg, fried king oyster mushrooms with a buffalo sauce, dates stuffed with duck confit and topped with candied pumpkin seeds, beef tongue with a soft boiled egg, shrimp on toast, a baby kale salad, pacific cod with charred cabbage, horseradish, and sorrel, and pan seared duck breast. Everything was delicious and the presentation was beautiful. It was a long relaxed dinner with great food; we both really enjoyed it.
Back at home, I finished opening the presents my family sent me and my gift from Joshua, then we completed the great day of celebrating with a board game and, of course, apple pie.
Thursday, March 10, 2016
Pizza Party Craziness
We have had three pizza parties with the philosophy graduate students within the past week and a half as part of our efforts to host the prospective students who are visiting the school. The philosophy department accepted a number of students to start the graduate program in the fall and offered all of those students the opportunity to come to the school to meet the faculty and students and attend classes for a couple days before they have to decide if they will accept the offer to come in the fall. Joshua was part of the committee that was responsible for hosting the visiting students and this year there where eight who decided to visit, which is a lot. I think last year there were four. He was working with another student to find current students who were willing to host the visitors, give rides to and from the airport, take them to dinner, take them to campus in the mornings, meet for coffee breaks, and give tours of the campus. With eight students visiting, it ended up being a lot of work. They not only had to find people who were available, but also tried to match them up with visitors who had similar interests, plus some other logistical details. It involved a lot of emails. All of this came during the last three weeks of classes when things are crazy anyway, so this term has been one of the most challenging since we have been here. But I think things went well and the visitors seemed to have good experiences.
As I mentioned, we had department pizza parties with the visitors and I got to be part of those. It was fun to get to meet new people, hang out with friends from the department, and eat free pizza, but having three so close together was a lot and two of them didn't start until 9pm, which is pretty late for us. Needless to say, there have been lots of good things about the past few weeks and Joshua and his fellow committee member did a great job, but we were relieved when the final visitors left yesterday.
Saturday, March 5, 2016
Goodbye Van
We had to say goodbye to the van today. We decided it was time to sell it because it needed some major repairs and we haven't used it much since moving to Oregon. This was another hard vehicle to get rid of. I felt like in some sense it was our first home, and is the only home we have ever owned. It was a lot of fun to remodel the whole thing with Dad and fix it up just the way we wanted it. Then it served us well on our over two month road trip. We have many good memories from that trip, plus some weekend camping trips. There were a couple camping trips in the rain made much more pleasant by the fact that we had a roof over our heads and not a tent. Just the smell of the van invokes in me a feeling of adventure and longing for the open road. Today it drove off with someone else; someone named Sara, appropriately enough. The new owners seem really nice and are super excited about the van. It is just what they have been looking for and they are planning to get it all fixed up and take it back out on the road to tour the country. So we will miss the van, but I'm happy that it will be well taken care of and back out adventuring.
Friday, February 26, 2016
Spring is Coming
Our first flower of spring bloomed yesterday. Of course, it is still winter and we are reminded of that with cold rainy days and morning temperatures that are still often around freezing. But spring is coming and you can feel the change in the air. We are starting to have some warm sunny afternoons; yesterday it was 68 when I was leaving work, which is the warmest it has been for months. There are flowers starting to pop up around town and by the side of the freeway. It is an exciting time of year.
Wednesday, February 24, 2016
A Special Guest
We had a special visitor yesterday; Grandad had some shopping to do in Eugene, so he came over for the afternoon and brought crab for dinner. What a treat to come home from work to such good company and delicious food.
Monday, February 15, 2016
Valentine's Day
I came out to the kitchen Sunday morning to find this display on the table. I was surprised and touched by it and have been enjoying all of it since then.
When we got home from church, we had pink heart-shaped pancakes and pink grapefruit juice for Valentine's Day breakfast.
We decided to stay home to celebrate with a fancy four-course meal for dinner as we often like to do. Here's our menu from this year:
Caramelized onion, pear, and feta savory tarts
Steak and salad
Chocolate cranberry bread
Sugar cookies
We enjoyed a leisurely and delicious dinner, including a walk around the block before the bread course. It was a great day.
Saturday, February 13, 2016
I Brought Home Some Flour
One of the great things about working at a bakery is that occasionally there is something they can't use anymore and the employees get to take it. This week I came home with about fifty pounds of flour. There were five different kinds so I spent some time looking them up online to find out what they were and discovered that I had a couple different bread flours, a regular unbleached flour, a barley flour, and another bread flour that is also supposed to be good in quick breads and cookies. Then I started putting them to good use. Over the past couple days, I've probably used four or five pounds of flour making pizza dough, pie crust, sugar cookies, and bagels. Everything seems to be turning out well with the new flours; the pizza dough in particular seemed better than usual.
This was my first attempt at making bagels and there is room for improvement, but I was happy with how they turned out. I was also excited to make and frost heart-shaped sugar cookies, which is a favorite baking activity. The past couple weeks have been busy at work as we get ready for Valentine's Day, but I have gotten to frost some sugar cookies there too and enjoyed doing that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

































